So in a sense, wind power is a much bigger factor in rising hydro rates than those pesky pensions. Especially given that it rarely is being produced when it is needed, and is often displacing hydro power.
The Toronto Star published the following article today:
That's an interesting article. You see that OPG's average price for the power it produces is less than HALF of what all the other private producers get (5.1 cents/KWh vs 10.7 cents/KWh). Yes, HALF. What that means folks, is that even after accounting for those "expensive" pensions, your provincially-owned generator is still HALF as expensive as all the other (private) sources of power in this province.
Now, you could say that if OPG was less generous with its employees, and cut its pensions costs, it might receive 4.9 cents /KWh, rather than the 5.1 cents it got. So yes, it is true that those pension costs are causing the overall rates to be higher. But when other private producers get an average of 10.7 cents/KWh, you can see how the pension costs (and indeed, ALL costs at OPG) are a drop in the bucket in terms of overall hydro rates.
So what is the bottom line in all this? What you should take away from this is that while you may be envious (even outraged) that those employees at the hydro agencies get nice pensions, they really don't have that big of an impact on hydro rates. Heck, even when those pensions are factored in, provincially-generated power is still HALF the cost of privately-generated power.